Writing the Scholarship Proposal
Graduate and senior undergraduate students typically apply for one or more of the following external scholarships, each of which entails a written proposal of research.
At the federal level, three agencies (the Tri-Council) grant funding to Canadian graduate students:
- The CIHR: The Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- The NSERC: The Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- The SSHRC: The Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
At the provincial level, students can apply for the Ontario Graduate Scholarship (OGS).
What is a Scholarship Proposal?
A scholarship proposal is a persuasive form of writing that demonstrates the writer’s knowledge, capacity, and potential as a researcher. Strong scholarship proposals convey complex information in concise terms to a multidisciplinary audience. By demonstrating both the significance of the proposed research and the credentials of the researcher, scholarship proposals make a case for the significance and implications of the research at hand, to the field and beyond.
Winning proposals are typically
- Concrete: they provide examples and substantiate claims; they draw on the research throughout to develop the topic; terms and concepts are defined.
- Detailed: every word counts; ideas are rich and developed.
- Feasible: the proposed project can be accomplished within the degree time limits of the applicant; the researcher has presented a plan for conducting and disseminating the research.
- Written in clear and concise language: even complex projects can be explained in clear terms, with minimal or selectively used jargon; successful proposals use strong verbs, the first person (“I”), and the active voice to keep the text lean.
Rhetorical Moves
Although the Tri-Council and OGS scholarship proposals differ in length, many of the same principles apply in writing each. In fact, successful scholarship proposals tend to share consistent rhetorical features: patterns of introducing, contextualizing, and demonstrating the significance of the research being proposed. Below, we’ll examine these rhetorical features through three key moves:
1. Establishing the Context
In setting the scene for your research, provide the context for the topic you’re researching. Consider, what has already been said on the topic? Is this topic particularly timely? What fundamental concepts will readers need to know to understand the topic?
Moves to Establish the Situation
Recently, there has been wide interest in . . .
Knowledge of X has great importance for understanding Y.
Many scholars have recently examined . . .
Scholars commonly suggest that . . .
Several studies have suggested that . . .
Scholars in the field of X have argued that . . .
2. Identifying the Problem
A persuasive scholarship proposal identifies a gap or oversight in the knowledge – something we don’t yet know and remains to be resolved or addressed. Consider, what does the scholarship say and not say about this topic? Where are the missing pieces in the scholarship? What are the implications of these oversights?
Moves to Establish the Problem
The existing research, however, has assumed that . . .
However, these studies have failed to recognize that . . .
But recent work in X points to another interpretation.
This view, however, is challenged by recent data showing . . .
However, there has been little research that examines . . .
The research has tended to focus on . . ., rather than . . .
Scholars have emphasized X aspect, but remained largely silent on . . .
Additional studies are needed to understand . . .
3. Locating the Solution
Once the proposal has clearly identified a gap in the knowledge, it’s time to identify how you intend to fill that gap or locate a solution to the problem you’ve presented. Consider, what is the purpose of your research? What does the proposed research argue, hypothesize, or describe? What methodology will you utilize? What is the significance of your research to the field? What theoretical contributions does your research make and/or what practical applications does it have?
Moves to Locate the Solution
The main purpose of this research is to . . .
I introduce a new interpretation that . . .
I will argue that . . .
This research proposes that . . .
My research contributes to a burgeoning field in X studies by . . .
In doing so, I connect X with Y to shift perspective on . . .
I will conduct the study by . . .
I use X theoretical approach to understand Y . . .
My research has implications for . . .
In addition to its theoretical contributions, my research can be applied in/to . . .
Pulling It All Together
Winning scholarship proposal go through multiple revisions. Dedicate time to drafting and revising your proposal over several weeks, if not months. Begin drafting your ideas well in advance of the deadline. Seek feedback from a diversity of readers (e.g., supervisors, mentors, Writing Services) to ensure you are communicating to specialists and non-specialists alike.
To book a writing appointment to review your proposal, use the Student Success Portal.
Notes
Examples of the rhetorical moves are adapted from John M. Swales, Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge UP, 1990.
Writing Services, Wilfrid Laurier University, CC By-NC 2023