Major Research Paper Option

• Dec. 1-15: Students should arrange to meet informally with faculty throughout December. In consultation with the graduate co-ordinator, each student will approach faculty members about supervising his/her MRP. Informal contact can be made during this time period, so that students may begin discussing their proposals with a faculty member.
• Jan. 15: Outline of topic due. After preliminary research, students submit a brief (250 word) outline of their proposed topic to the graduate co-ordinator. The outline should briefly identify the primary issue(s) to be addressed along with the rationale for the project. Students may indicate their preferred supervisor and reader; however, the graduate committee is ultimately responsible for assigning these roles.
• Feb. 1 to March 15: Announcement of supervisory committees. Advisors are formally assigned. Students begin working on their proposal with their advisor.
• March 15 onward:
  • Students, supervisors and readers meet to discuss project and develop timeline.
  • Students submit ethics review materials to supervisors and ethics review board if necessary.
  • Proposal draft due. Students will submit the draft to their respective advisors for comment.
• April 15: Final proposal due. The proposal is a substantial, well-researched, formal document which provides a detailed outline for the MRP (10-12 pages in length). To this end, the proposal must accomplish three things:
  • The proposal must identify the particular topic or issue(s) you are addressing and clearly situate it within the relevant academic literature. It is not expected that the student will have read all of the material cited in the proposal; instead, the proposal identifies both sources consulted and those that will be consulted as part of the project. The proposal will therefore include a working bibliography.
  • The proposal will document the personal standpoint, theoretical perspective and methodological approach, values and ethics pertinent to the proposed MRP, and will indicate, to the best abilities of the student, the assumptions and exclusions that the project makes. Note: Students who intend to work with human subjects must receive ethics approval and should consult with their supervisor prior to submission of the proposal.
  • The proposal will include a clearly articulated schedule of research and writing for the project which is in keeping with the timeline provided below.
• May to June: Research, Writing, and Revisions. In continued consultation with the supervisor and guided by the proposal, students will research and write the MRP in spring and summer. It is important that students pay particular attention to the possibilities of racism, heterosexism, sexism and other forms of oppression within the language or the design of the MRP.
• June 15: An initial draft of the MRP is due to the supervisor. This draft should be a complete, formal document with full citations. It is expected that the supervisor and student will meet shortly after the submission date to discuss the draft and plan for subsequent research and writing.
• July 15: The final draft of the document should be submitted to the supervisor by July 15. At this point the supervisor will consult with the reader and, if they conclude that the MRP is defensible, will notify the student of a defence date by Aug. 1.
• Aug. 1-15: MRP Evaluation. Our MRPs no longer have a mandatory oral defence. Instead, the MRP draft will be evaluated by am evaluation committee made of up the supervisor, second reader, and graduate coorcinator or designate. An oral defence may still be arranged by mutual consent of the student and committee. The  evaluation. committee will determine whether or not the MRP is to be passed, as well as the extent of revisions (if any), and will inform the student of the results at the conclusion of the evaluation.
• Aug. 21: Final submission. The final copy of the MRP must be submitted directly to the Communication Studies office by Aug. 21. You must submit an electronic copy. Consult the department office for more detailed instructions. It is expected that this final copy will take into account the criticisms and suggestions made on the final draft of the MRP as well as in the defence. Note: The final copy of the MRP must be approved by the supervisor before submission to the department. It is therefore recommended that the document be submitted to the supervisor in advance of the deadline. The student will have the option to submit their MRP to Scholars Commons for publication.

• Dec. 1-15: Students should arrange to meet informally with faculty throughout December. In consultation with the graduate co-ordinator, each student will approach faculty members about supervising his/her MRP. Informal contact can be made during this time period, so that students may begin discussing their proposals with a faculty member.
• Jan. 15: Outline of topic due. After preliminary research, students submit a brief (250 word) outline of their proposed topic to the graduate co-ordinator. The outline should briefly identify the primary issue(s) to be addressed along with the rationale for the project. Students may indicate their preferred supervisor and reader; however, the graduate committee is ultimately responsible for assigning these roles.
• Feb. 1 to March 15: Announcement of supervisory committees. Advisors are formally assigned. Students begin working on their proposal with their advisor.
• March 15 onward:
  • Students, supervisors and readers meet to discuss project and develop timeline.
  • Students submit ethics review materials to supervisors and ethics review board if necessary.
  • Proposal draft due. Students will submit the draft to their respective advisors for comment.
• Sept. 15: Final proposal due. The proposal is a substantial, well-researched, formal document which provides a detailed outline for the MRP (10-12 pages in length). To this end, the proposal must accomplish three things:
  • The proposal must identify the particular topic or issue(s) you are addressing and clearly situate it within the relevant academic literature. It is not expected that the student will have read all of the material cited in the proposal; instead, the proposal identifies both sources consulted and those that will be consulted as part of the project. The proposal will therefore include a working bibliography.
  • The proposal will document the personal standpoint, theoretical perspective and methodological approach, values and ethics pertinent to the proposed MRP, and will indicate, to the best abilities of the student, the assumptions and exclusions that the project makes. Note: Students who intend to work with human subjects must receive ethics approval and should consult with their supervisor prior to submission of the proposal.
  • The proposal will include a clearly articulated schedule of research and writing for the project which is in keeping with the timeline provided below.
• September to October: Research, Writing, and Revisions. In continued consultation with the supervisor and guided by the proposal, students will research and write the MRP in spring and summer. It is important that students pay particular attention to the possibilities of racism, heterosexism, sexism and other forms of oppression within the language or the design of the MRP.
• Oct. 15: An initial draft of the MRP is due to the supervisor. This draft should be a complete, formal document with full citations. It is expected that the supervisor and student will meet shortly after the submission date to discuss the draft and plan for subsequent research and writing.
• Nov. 15: The final draft of the document should be submitted to the supervisor by November. 15. At this point the supervisor will consult with the reader and, if they conclude that the MRP is defensible, will notify the student of a defence date by December 1.
• Dec. 1-15: MRP Evaluation. Our MRPs no longer have a mandatory oral defence. Instead, the MRP draft will be evaluated by am evaluation committee made of up the supervisor, second reader, and graduate coorcinator or designate. An oral defence may still be arranged by mutual consent of the student and committee. The  evaluation. committee will determine whether or not the MRP is to be passed, as well as the extent of revisions (if any), and will inform the student of the results at the conclusion of the evaluation.
• Dec. 21: Final submission. The final copy of the MRP must be submitted directly to the Communication Studies office by December 21. You must submit an electronic copy. Consult the department office for more detailed instructions. It is expected that this final copy will take into account the criticisms and suggestions made on the final draft of the MRP as well as in the defence. Note: The final copy of the MRP must be approved by the supervisor before submission to the department. It is therefore recommended that the document be submitted to the supervisor in advance of the deadline. The student will have the option to submit their MRP to Scholars Commons for publication.

• The MRP (or thesis) must be formatted according to these guidelines:
• The MRP must be double spaced throughout and in 12-point font.
• Paper used for the defence copies should be 8.5x11 inches and of any weight and can be double-sided, but the final copy must be 8.5x11 inches, 20 lb. bond paper and single sided.
• Acceptable printers include laser and ink-jet.
• Margins must be one inch on each side, with the exception that the final copy must have a left margin of 1.5 inches to allow for binding.
• The first line of every paragraph should be indented a standard five spaces.
  Abbreviations may be used (if conventional in the particular discipline) but must be defined the first time they are used.
• If there are alternative correct spellings of a particular word, either form may be used, but such use must be consistent throughout the MRP.
• The pages should be numbered in consecutive order with Arabic numerals, starting with the first page of text and continuing through to the last page of the entire MRP, including endnotes/footnotes, appendices and references. Pages preceding the text, starting with the first page of the abstract should be numbered consecutively with lower-case Roman numerals.
• The title page of the MRP must contain the Universal Copyright Notice©.
• References and citations must follow either APA or MLA format.
• The organizational sequence should be as follows:
  • title page of the MRP
  • abstract
  • acknowledgments
  • table of contents
  • list of tables (if appropriate)
  • list of figures (if appropriate)
  • text of the MRP
  • endnotes and/or footnotes (may be included in the text)
  • appendices (if appropriate)
  • references

The title page must be organized as follows:

(TITLE OF MRP)
by
(full name of the author)©
(undergraduate degree, university, year)
Major Research Paper
Submitted to the Department of Communication Studies
in partial fulfillment of the requirements for
Master of Arts
Wilfrid Laurier University
20XX