We use cookies on this site to enhance your experience.
By selecting “Accept” and continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies.
Undergraduate course-based research activities may be delegated to a departmental Research Ethics Committee (REC) if you meet the specific criteria.
If your research qualifies for departmental ethics review, you must fill out a REC Review Application form and submit it to your department's research ethics committee (REC).
If your department does not have a REC (check for REC), you must submit an ethics application to the Research Ethics Board, using the ROMEO research portal instead.
You must review Laurier’s Policy 11.13 on Ethics Review of Research Involving Humans.
All individuals listed on the application for review must also complete the current online TCPS 2 Course on Research Ethics (CORE) and provide proof of completion.
Your research activity may qualify for departmental research ethics committee (REC) review if you meet all of the following criteria:
If any of the above criteria is not met, the project must be submitted to the University Research Ethics Board (REB).
* In some cases, graduate classwork may be subject to review by the REC. This can only occur if the instructor has sought previous approval to do so from the REB. Details on this process can be found in the Request for REC Review for Graduate-Level Course-Based Research Projects document.
If you meet the criteria:
All correspondence related to your application will be sent to your Laurier email address.
When individual students (or groups of students) within a class will each undertake different research projects, each student (or group of students) will need to prepare their own application for ethics review.
When individual members (or groups of students) within a class will each be undertaking the same research project, the instructor may submit one application (as the PI) on behalf of the entire class.
The research must meet the following criteria:
It is the instructor’s responsibility to ensure that it is feasible to obtain ethics review and complete a research project within the course timeframe. Instructors should ensure students have enough time to:
Courses that are only one term long can make timelines challenging. In this case, we recommend that instructors submit ethics applications in advance of the term when feasible, and to structure research activities that fit criteria for departmental ethics committee review when possible.
Please see REB Timelines for more information on average REB review timelines.
Students are often interested in conducting research on topics that they find interesting and engaging. However, it is very important to carefully consider the topics selected. Higher-than-minimal-risk research and longitudinal designs are examples of projects that should be carefully considered by the faculty advisor/ course instructor to ensure that the ethics review and approval process and research activities will fit into the proposed timeframe. Examples of research topics that may be considered higher than minimal risk and/or require a higher level of review include:
Please ensure to consult with your faculty advisor/course instructor on your research design to determine what is appropriate for the timeframe of the project and level of research being conducted.
Departmental REC Documents
Contact Us:
REB General Inquiries
E:
REB@wlu.ca
T:
548.889.3518
Office Location: Alumni Hall
Office Hours:
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.